Growth changes of tomato seedlings responding to sodium salt of α

Jul 13, 2023

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 4024 (2023) Cite this article

724 Accesses

2 Citations

Metrics details

In present study, sodium salt of α-naphthalene acetic acid (NA), potassium salt of fulvic acid (KF) and their combinations were applied to the growth substrates of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under chilling stress. The changes in aboveground biomass, root attributes, pigment contents, chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis, osmotic regulation substances, and antioxidant enzymes activity of the tomato seedlings in response to NA and KF were investigated. The application of NA, KF and their combination could promote the growth of plant height and stem diameter of tomato seedlings under chilling stress to varying degrees, and improve root characteristics by increasing root volume, root length and root activity, and increase dry matter accumulation. In addition, the combined use of NA and KF improved the seedling leaf chlorophyll content, qP, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII , Pn and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes in the tomato plants. The above results suggested a synergistic effect between NA and KF to stimulate the seedlings growth and to enhance the ROS scavenging ability of tomato, which has never been reported in previous research before. However, further researches are needed to explore the physiological and molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic effect between NA and KF.

The population growth and economic development has aroused the demands for increasing crop productivity including field crops, fruits and vegetables1,2. In recent years, however, the total crop production has been continuously challenged by environmental degradation, destruction of natural ecosystems and loss of biodiversity3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, and the increased production must be achieved by improving crop yield and land use efficiency. Although the genetic improvements have made great effort in increasing the crop yield potential, the yield gap in actual production, which is influenced by environmental factor, fertilizer application, and several biotic and abiotic stresses, has greatly affected the yield stability11. Therefore, approaches to enhance crop growth performance and to diminish the negative effects of abiotic stresses and inappropriate crop management on yield stability are desperately needed. Regulating the crop growth by plant growth regulators (PGR) is an important approach in modern agriculture12,13. In the past decades, several PGRs including paclobutrazol, gibberellins, chlormequat chloride and mepiquat chloride have successfully developed and adopted in the production of various crops, and their effects and regulating mechanisms on crop yield, quality and stress tolerance have been intensively studied14,15,16,17,18. The beneficial of the PGRs includes improving crop yield, modifying crop growth speed, regulating nutritional quality and enhancing stress tolerance19,20,21,22. But the overuse of PGRs may raise concerns of the potential health risks to consumers and environmental pollution23. Plant biostimulant means a material which contains substance(s) and/or microorganisms whose function when applied to plants or the rhizosphere is to stimulate natural processes to benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, and/or crop quality, independently of its nutrient content24. The biostimulant obsessed a similar or better function, but with smaller risks of human health and environmental pollution as compared with PGRs, and has now widely used in the production of fruits and vegetables.

The KF is a typical biostimulant, and NA is is a synthetic auxin, known for decades and registered as a PGR, i.e., a plant protection product. KF is the active organic compound in soil humid acid. It is a highly efficient macro-molecular organic compound with short carbon chain molecular structure and high solubility25. KF has a low molecular weight and can be easily absorbed and utilized by crops26, which can not only regulate plant growth but also provide potassium for plant growth27. KF can promote the formation of new roots, increase the contents of chlorophyll, indolence acid and abscissa acid, promote dry matter accumulation, enhance the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reduce stomach opening, reduce transpiration rate and improve net photosynthetic rate, so as to enhance crop stress resistance and improve crop yield, quality and benefit28. NA is a kind of broad-spectrum, high efficiency and low toxicity plant growth regulator. NA can promote cell division and expansion, improve the rate of flowering and fruit setting, prevent falling flower and fruit29, expand fruit, promote early maturity, increase yield30, and improve quality. At the same time, NA can also effectively improve crop drought resistance, cold resistance, water logging resistance, salt and alkali resistance. Previously, the regulating effects of NA and KF have been observed in wheat28, soybea n31, cotton32, pepper33, coriander34, ficus religiosa35. Nevertheless, the combining effects ofNA and KF has remained to be unknown.

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) originated in Ecuador and other places in South America. The planting area and output of tomato in China ranks among the top in the world, and it is one of the common vegetables and fruits necessary for people's daily life. In the past decades, the development of industrial cultivation has greatly promoted the transition of the tomato production from open-field to greenhouse or plant factory, which largely improved the production efficiency and profits for farmers. And there are growing needs to enhance the growth of tomato seedlings via PGRs or biostimulants under intensive production condition. The present study examined the effects of NA, KF and their combinations on the seedling growth, photosynthesis and stress tolerant traits of tomato under chilling stress, we surprisingly found that the NA, KF and their combination affected the growth of tomato seedlings under chilling stress, in addition, the combined use of NA and KF significantly improved the quality of tomato seedlings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research that observed the synergistic effect of NA and KF on enhancing crop growth performance.

The effects of NA, KF and their combination on the aboveground seedling attributes (plant height and stem diameter), fresh weight and dry weight in seedlings of tomato was investigated. The application of NA, KF and their combination showed significant influence on the plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weight as compared with control (Fig. 1). The plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 13.04%, 25.14% 18.39% and 17.16%. In addition, the plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato seedlings treated by the single material (NA, KF) treatment were significantly higher than CK, except for the dry weight used in NA treatment. It can be clearly deduced that NA, KF and their combination did improve plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weightin tomato seedlings, at the same time, the combined application of the NA + KF treatment was better.

Effects of different treatments on plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato seedlings. (A) Plant height, (B) stem diameter, (C) fresh weight, (D) dry weight, NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

The effects of NA, KF and their combination on the seedling root parameters in seedlings of tomato was investigated. The application of NA, KF and their combination showed significant influence on the seedling root parameters as compared with control (Fig. 2). The root volume, maximum root length and root activity of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the root volume, maximum root length and root activity of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 32.88%, 13.34% and 30.44%. In addition, the root volume, maximum root length and root activity of tomato seedlings treated by the KF treatment were significantly higher than CK. It can be clearly deduced that the combined application of the NA + KF treatment significantly improved the root volume, maximum root length and root activity in the tomato seedlings.

Effects of different treatments on root parameters of tomato seedlings. (A) Root volume, (B) maximum root length, (C) root activity, NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

The effects of NA, KF and their combination on the seedling leaf chlorophyll content in seedlings of tomato was investigated. The application of NA and KF showed no significant influence on the seedling leaf chlorophyll content as compared with control (Fig. 3A–C). However, the combined application of NA and KF significantly promoted the tomato seedling leaf chlorophyll content. When compared with CK, NA + KF treatment chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and chlorophyll a + b was raised by 29.33%, 27.86% and 28.96%. Nevertheless, the chlorophyll a/b of tomato seedling was not significant in all treatment (Fig. 3D). It can be clearly deduced that the combined application of the NA + KF treatment improved the seedling leaf chlorophyll content in the tomato plants.

Effects of different treatments on leaf chlorophyll content of tomato seedlings. (A) Chlorophyll a, (B) Chlorophyll b, (C) Chlorophyll a + b, (D) Chlorophyll a/b, NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

The changes in chlorophyll fluorescence of the tomato seedlings under different treatments regarding NPQ, qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII were shown in Fig. 4. The qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 21.33%, 17.39% and 17.91% (Fig. 4B–D), respectively. In addition, the qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII of tomato seedlings all had the second values in KF treatment, and were significantly higher than CK. Compared with CK, an increase the qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII of tomato seedlings for KF treatment were observed by 9.33%, 9.70% and 4.48% (Fig. 4B–D), respectively. However, The application of all treatment showed no significant influences the NPQ as compared with CK (Fig. 4A). Overall, it can be clearly deduced that the combined application of the NA + KF treatment improved the qP, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII in the tomato plants.

Effects of different treatments on chlorophyll fluorescence of tomato seedlings. (A) NPQ, (B) qP, (C) Fv/Fm, (D) ΦPSII, NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

The changes in photosynthesis of the tomato seedlings under different treatments regarding photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and transpiration rates of leaves (E) were shown in Fig. 5. The photosynthetic parameters (Pn, Gs, Ci and E) of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, in addition, the photosynthetic parameters (except Ci) were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the Pn, Gs, Ci and E of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 18.45%, 32.06%, 5.51% and 30.77% (Fig. 5), respectively. However, compared with CK, the Pn and E of tomato seedlings was not significantly different under single material (NA, KF) treatment (Fig. 5A,D). It can be clearly deduced that single material (NA, KF) treatment did not improve Pn in tomato seedlings, in contrary, the combined application of the NA + KF treatment significantly improved the Pn in the tomato seedlings.

Effects of different treatments on photosynthesis of tomato seedlings. (A) Photosynthetic rate (Pn), (B) stomatal conductance (Gs), (C) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), (D) transpiration rates of leaves (E), NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

The soluble sugar, soluble protein, sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) of the tomato seedlings was focused on in Fig. 6, and significant variations in soluble sugar, soluble protein, SS and SPS was observed different treatments. The soluble sugar, soluble protein, SS and SPS of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the soluble sugar, soluble protein, SS and SPS of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 11.57%, 24.34%, 5.80% and 9.67% (Fig. 8), respectively. In addition, the soluble sugar, SS and SPS of tomato seedlings had the second values in KF treatment, and were significantly higher than CK. Compared with CK, an increase the soluble sugar, SS and SPS of tomato seedlings for KF treatment were observed by 3.24%, 1.80% and 5.11% (Fig. 6A–C), respectively. It can be clearly deduced that the combined application of the NA + KF treatment improved the soluble sugar, soluble protein, SS and SPS in the tomato seedling leaves.

Effects of different treatments on soluble sugar, soluble protein, sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate of tomato seedlings. (A) Soluble sugar, (B) soluble protein, (C) sucrose synthase (SS), (D) Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

Data of the tomato seedlings antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD activity, POD activity) along with MDA content are presented in Fig. 7. The application of NA, KF and their combination showed significant influence on the seedling antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA contents as compared with control (Fig. 7). The SOD activity and POD activity of tomato seedlings all had the maximum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly higher than other treatments. Compared with CK, an increase the SOD activity and POD activity of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 56.15% and 98.32%. In addition, the SOD activity and POD activity of tomato seedlings treated by the single material (NA, KF) treatment were significantly higher than CK. The MDA content of tomato seedlings all had the minimum values in NA + KF treatment, and were significantly lesser than other treatments. Compared with CK, an decrease the MDA content of tomato seedlings for NA + KF treatment were observed by 33.62%. In addition, the MDA content of tomato seedlings treated by the single material (NA, KF) treatment were significantly lesser than CK. It can be clearly deduced that NA, KF and their combination did improve the seedling antioxidant enzyme activities in the tomato plants, at the same time, the combined application of the NA + KF treatment was better.

Effects of different treatments on antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA content of tomato seedlings. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) peroxidase (POD), (C) malondialdehyde (MDA), NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Different lowercase letters denote statistical differences among treatments of tomato seedlings at the 5% level according to LSD test. Error bars above mean indicate standard error (n = 3).

A heat map synthesizing the response of the measured parameters provided an integrated view of the effect of different treatments on the morphogenesis,antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthetic traits of tomato seedlings (Fig. 8). In most of the measured parameters of tomato seedlings under different treatments (NA, KF and NA + KF) treatment were significantly higher than CK. In addition, in most of the measured parameters of tomato seedlings under the NA + KF treatment were significantly higher than that of the other treatments. Among the tomato seedlings, the NA and FK clusters are the closest to each other in terms of measured parameter responses, and the NA and FK clusters are equidistant from cluster CK. At the same time, cluster NA + KF is considerably separated from the other three clusters (CK, NA and FK): NA + KF reduced MDA content, and increased ΦPSII, Fv/Fm, qP, NPQ, Ci, SOD, SPS, dry Weight, root activity, maximum root length, root volume, soluble protein, E, chlorophyll b, soluble sugar, SS, chlorophyll a + b, chlorophyll a, Gs, Pn, stem diameter, POD, fresh weight and plant height compared to CK, NA and FK, contributing to separate the NA + KF cluster from the others.

Cluster heat map analysis summarizing tomato seedlings responses to different treatments. NA, 5 mg·kg−1 NA; KF, 60 mg·kg−1 KF; NA + KF, 5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF. Results are visualized using a false color scale with blue indicating an increase and red a decrease of the response parameters.

Chilling is one of the major abiotic stresses limiting the growth and productivity of many crops36. In this study, the effects of NA, KF and their combination treatments on seedling growth of tomato were investigated under chilling stress. The results of the present study were consistent with the previous researches37 that the plant height, stem diameter, root volume, maximum root length and root activity, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato seedling under NA and KF and their combination treatments were higher than those under CK (Figs. 1,2). NA, KF and their combination treatments can promote the growth of tomato seedlings by increasing the chlorophyll content of leaves and promoting the photosynthesis of plants under chilling stress (Figs. 3,5).

Under low temperature conditions, the root strength of tomato seedlings directly determines the growth status of the plants38. The results of the NA and KF and their combination treatments can result in development of the root system, expansion and elongation of the root and improve root vitality leading to improved uptake of water and nutrients39. Apart from that, the phenomenon in this may have some relationship to the abundance of organic carbon and potassium elements in KF, and KF application increases the nutrients, availability26, and it allows nutrients to interact with each other and divides them into the simplest forms attached by the KF electrolyte. However, the physiological mechanism of how NA and KF and their combination treatments affect soil physicochemical properties and then plant root growth and development remains to be further studied.

Soluble sugar and soluble protein are the important osmotic regulation substances in plants because of its strong water absorption40, which can reduce the freezing point of cell liquid and reduce the water loss ability of protoplasm, could directly or indirectly regulate the growth and development process of plants41. Therefore, soluble sugar and soluble protein play an important role in plant resistance to chilling stress42. This research found that the combined application of the NA + KF treatment improved the soluble sugar and soluble protein in the tomato seedling leaves (Fig. 6A,B). In addition, we found that the combined use of NA and KF improved SS and SPS (Fig. 6C,D), and thus beneficial to the synthesis and accumulation of soluble sugar.

Under chilling stress, plants can accelerate the dissipation process of excessive excitation energy through self-regulation43. However, due to the limitation of self-regulation, there is still a certain proportion of excitation energy that cannot be effectively utilized or dissipated, and part of this energy will be converted into electric energy, leading to excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The excess ROS will react with the plasma membrane to form MDA, destroy the plant membrane system, cause the deformation of chloroplasts and other organs, lead to protein degeneration, DNA damage, enzyme passivation, and disrupt various physiological processes such as Calvin cycle. It has been shown that NA and KFcan effectively alleviate the ROS generation caused by stress such as salt stress, drought, heavy metal and senescence44,45,46. This research found that NA, KF and their combination did improve the seedling antioxidant enzyme activities and decreased MDA accumulation in the tomato plants under chilling stress. Nevertheless, further study is needed to explore the physio-biochemical and molecular mechanisms of NA, KF and their combination treatments in crop production in enhancing chilling resistance.

In this study, the single application of NA and KF showed positive effects on the various indicators of tomato seedlings as compared with control. Nevertheless, the innovative findings of this study, the combined application of NA and KF showed significant positive effects on the fresh weight, dry weight, root parameters, chilling tolerance of tomato seedlings plants cultivated under chilling stress. In other words, the synergistic effects of NA and KF on the seedling growth performance of tomato under chilling stress, and the mechanism behind this synergy mechanism has not been studied before. The growth of plants is inseparable from its good photosynthesis. Photosynthetic pigment is the material basis of photosynthesis in plants47, and its content directly determines the ability of plants to absorb and fix light energy, which is the direct expression of the strength of plant photosynthetic capacity48. The results of the application results of the single application of NA and KF increased the chlorophyll content of seedling leaves, but had no significant effect, compared with the control (Fig. 3). However, what's interesting is that the combined application of NA and KF significantly promoted the tomato seedling leaf chlorophyll content, and it also indicated that NA and KF had a synergistic effect on promoting chlorophyll formation in plants under chilling stress49. The combined application of NA and KF played an important role in maintaining the integrity of chloroplast structure and function under chilling stress.

The chlorophyll content of plant leaves directly affects its photosynthetic fluorescence parameters50. Photosynthetic fluorescence parameters are an effective way to study the photosynthetic physiological status of plants and have been widely used in monitoring the photosynthetic performance of various plants51,52,53. qP reflects the proportion of light energy absorbed by ΦPSII for photochemical reaction, while NPQ reflects the proportion of light energy absorbed by ΦPSII for heat dissipation54,55. Chilling stress resulted in the decrease of qP and the increase of NPQ in plant leaves56. However, the combined use of NA and KF alleviated the decrease of qP, but further promoted the increase of NPQ (Fig. 4A,B). The results indicated that NA and KF was beneficial to maintain the photoconversion of ΦPSII, promoted the dissipation of excessive excitation energy, and alleviated the pressure of excessive excitation energy on the photosynthetic system. In this study, the combined use of NA and KF in tomato seedlings under chilling stress increased Fv/Fm and ΦPSII (Fig. 4C,D), and then promoted Pn (Fig. 5A)57. However, the improvement of photosynthetic pigment and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters by the combination of NA and KF is caused by the complex physiological mechanism of plant photosynthesis, rather than the simple additive effect, which still needs to be further studied.

The application of NA and KF and their combination could promote the growth of plant height and stem diameter of tomato seedlings under chilling stress to varying degrees, and improve root characteristics by increasing root volume, root length and root activity, and increase dry matter accumulation. In addition, the combined use of NA and KF improved the seedling leaf chlorophyll content, qP, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII , Pn and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes in the tomato plants. The above results suggested a synergistic effect between NA and KF to stimulate the growth of tomato seedlings under chilling stress, which has never been reported in previous research before. The present study provided new avenues for NA and KF in crop production. Nevertheless, further study are needed to explore the physio-biochemical and molecular mechanisms of NA, KF and their combination treatments in crop production.

The seeds of an elite tomato variety ‘Jinfen’ were obtained from Henan Yuyi Seed Industry Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.

The tomato seeds were soaked in distilled water with the water temperature of 55 °C for 18 h and then germinated on two layers of filter papers in a germination box at 28 °C in a growth chamber until radicle protrusion. The germinated seeds were then sown on 50-cell tray (length/width: 54 cm/28 cm) with nutritional soil (peat:vermiculite:perlite = 3:2:2). When the first leaf of tomato seedlings were fully expanded, the seedling trays were transferred to an artificial climate chamber (YHMR-1000, Ningbo Yanghui Instrument Co., Ltd, China) with 12 h photoperiod (200 μmol m−2 s−1), 25 °C/18 °C (daytime/night), and 70%/80% (daytime/night) relative humidity.

The experiments were arranged in complete-randomized design with three replications, and 30 plants for each replication. At three-leaf stage, the tomato seedlings with similar growth performance were selected and transplanted into the nutrient bowl (Bottom diameter/calibre/height:8 cm/10 cm/10 cm) with nutritional soil (peat:vermiculite:perlite = 3:2:2), and further treatments with 12 h photoperiod (200 μmol m−2 s−1), 12 °C/6 °C (daytime/night), and 70%/80% (daytime/night) relative humidity.

The treatments includes NA (5 mg·kg−1 NA), KF (60 mg·kg−1 KF), NA + (5 mg·kg−1 NA and 60 mg·kg−1 KF), the distilled water were used as control. At 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 days after transplanting, 30 ml of the treatment solution were added, and the concentration of each treatment solution was optimized in a preliminary experiment. The detailed information of the treatments was shown in Table 1.

After 21 days of transplanting, the tomato seedlings plants under different treatments were sampled, and the related indexes were determined. The sample parts were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

Plant height, stem diameter, root length, root volume, fresh weight, and dry weight. Plants with consistent growth were selected for sampling, and ten plants were selected for each replicate.. The measurement determination was done according to the method described by Zheng et al.58,59.

Using TTC REDOX method60, 0.5 g of root tip was taken and immersed in a solution of 0.4% TTC and 5 mL phosphoric acid buffer (pH 7.0), and kept dark for 2 h at 37 °C. After that, 1 mol·L−1 sulfuric acid was added to stop the reaction. Put the root into a mortar, add ethyl acetate 3–4 mL to fully grind, move the red extract into the calibration tube, rinse with ethyl acetate several times and constant volume to 10 mL, use phototypesetter to compare colors at wavelength 485 nm, use blank test (the root was treated with sulfuric acid first) as reference to measure the absorbance, check the standard curve, TTC reduction amount can be calculated.

The leaf samples were mixed with sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.8) and ground in an ice bath. The superannuate was mixed with 95% ethanol and kept in the dark for 30 min before being centrifuged at 1000×g under 4 °C for 15 min. The absorbance at wavelengths 665 nm and 649 nm was measured using a phototypesetter (Hitachi, U-2900)61.

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured by a FluorPen 110/D (PSI, Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic). At 21 days after treatment, the chlorophyll fluorescence detection method was according to Oxborough62. In brief, the plants were dark adapted for 20 min prior determination of minimum (F0) and maximum (Fm) fluorescence.Then, leaves wereadapted to PPFD of 500 mmol m−2 s−1 and a saturating pulse of 0.8 s with > 6000 mmol m−2 s−1 was applied in order to determine the minimum (F'0), maximum (F'm) and the steady-state (Fs) fluorescence in light adapted conditions. Each treatment was repeated three times.The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) due to dissipation of excess light energy was calculated as Eq. (1). The coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP) due to an estimate of open PSII reaction centers was calculated as Eq. (2). The maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) was determined as Eq. (3). The quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) was calculated according to Eq. (4).

At 21 days after treatment, the second fully expanded leaf was used for determination of photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and transpiration rates of leaves (E) using an infrared gas analyzer (LI-6400, Li-COR, Lincoln, OR, USA) in a growth chamber with a constant temperature of 25 °C, 400 mg·kg−1 CO2 concentration and 70% relative humidity63.

soluble sugar was measured by the Song62 method. Samples (0.1 g fresh leaves) were put into a test tube, to which 10 mL of distilled water was added and mixed. After 30 min in a water bath at 95 °C, the supernatant was collected. This step was repeated three times, and then distilled water was added to a volume of 10 mL. The soluble sugar content was determined with the sulfuric acid anthrone method at a wavelength of 620 nm.

Soluble protein was measured by the Song62 method. Samples (0.1 g fresh leaves) were ground up in a mortar with liquid nitrogen, to which 6 mL of a phosphatebuffered solution (pH 7.0) was added. The extract was centrifuged at 15,000×g for 20 min at 4 °C, and 0.2 mL of the supernatant was combined with 9.8 mL of a Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 solution (0.1 g·L−1). After 5 min, the soluble protein content was determined at a wavelength of 595 nm.

Sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) was extracted using assay kits (ZC-S0507, ZC-S0508, Shanghai ZCIBIO Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and the activity was measured at 480 nm by the ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The catalytic production of 1 μg sucrose per g tissue per minute is defined as a unit of enzyme activity.

The leaf samples were mixed with three sodium phosphate buffer (50, pH 7.4) and ground in an ice bath before being centrifuged at 15,000×g under 4 °C for 30 min. The superannuate was mixed with methamphetamine–methamphetamine buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4), EDTA/MnCl2 (100 mM/50 mM, pH 7.4), 2-mercaptoethanol (10 mM), and NADH (7.5 mM). The SOD activity was determined by a phototypesetter (Hitachi, U-2900) at 340 nm. In this study, one unit of SOD was defined as the enzyme activity that inhibits 50% of the NADH oxidation rate in blank samples64.

The leaf samples were mixed with sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.8, containing 1 mM hydrodynamic) and ground in an ice bath. The ground sample was centrifuged at 6000×g under 4 °C for 25 min. The superannuate was mixed with titanium chloride (0.1% v/v dissolved in 20% (v/v) H2SO4) and centrifuged at 4000×g at room temperature for 30 min. The POD activity was determined by a phototypesetter (Hitachi, U-2900) at 410 nm65.

The leaf samples were ground in trigonometrical acid (TCA, 5% w/v) before being centrifuged at 10,000×g under 20 °C for 5 min. The superannuate was mixed with barbiturate acid (0.5% w/v, containing 20% w/v TCA) and placed in a water bath at 95 °C for 30 min before centrifuging at 3000×g under room temperature for 10 min. The MDA activity was determined by a spectrophotometer (Hitachi, U-2900) at 532 and 600 nm66,67.

A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to test the effects of NA and KF on Tomato Seedling using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). test was used to make post-choc multiple comparisons at α = 0.05. Different alphabetical letters are used in figures and tables for showing significant differences.

We ensure that we have permission to collect tomato plants, and experimental research and field studies on plants including the collection of plant material, comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation (Supplementary Information).

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files). We ensure that we have permission to collect tomato plants, and experimental research and field studies on plants including the collection of plant material, comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Gebrehiwot, A. A. et al. Using ABM to study the potential of land use change for mitigation of food deserts. Sustainability 14(15), 9715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159715 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Verma, B., Pramanik, P., & Bhaduri, D. Organic fertilizers for sustainable soil and environmental management. in Nutrient Dynamics for Sustainable Crop Production (Meena, R.S. Ed.). 289–313 (Springer, 2020).

Droste, N. et al. Soil carbon insures arable crop production against increasing adverse weather due to climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc5e3 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Daba, N. et al. Long-term fertilization and lime-induced soil pH changes affect nitrogen use efficiency and grain yields in acidic soil under wheat-maize rotation. Agronomy 11, 2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102069 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yan, L. et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of chemical fertilizer application and manure application potential in China. Environ. Eng. Sci. 36, 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0486 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gang-Hua, L. I. High quality and high efficiency fertilization of rice. J. Integr. Agric. 20, 1435–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63683-3 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Warsame, A. A., Mohamed, J. & Mohamed, A. A. The relationship between environmental degradation, agricultural crops, and livestock production in somalia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 30(3), 7825–7835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22595-8 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wu, J. et al. More land, less pollution? How land transfer affects fertilizer application. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 11268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111268 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ye, L. et al. Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Sci. Rep.-UK 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56954-2 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, X. Decision-making behavior of fertilizer application of grain growers in Heilongjiang Province from the perspective of risk preference and risk perception. Math. Probl. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6667558 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Stuart, A. M. et al. Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: Insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Res. 194, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.039 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Yueyue, T. et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on flower abscission and growth of tea plant Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. J. Plant Growth Regul. 41(3), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10365-8 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liu, C. et al. Novel plant growth regulator guvermectin from plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boosts biomass and grain yield in rice. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 70(51), 16229–16240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07072 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Widyastuti, T. The paclobutrazol application and pinching technique on lisianthus plants. Earth Environ. Sci. 752, 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/752/1/012055 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Hajihashemi, S. Physiological, biochemical, antioxidant and growth characterizations of gibberellin and paclobutrazol-treated sweet leaf herb. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 27(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-017-0428-4 (2018).

Article MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar

Khan, N., Bano, A. & Babar, M. D. A. Impacts of plant growth promoters and plant growth regulators on rainfed agriculture. PLoS ONE 15(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231426 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bhalla, K., Singh, S. B. & Agarwal, R. Quantitative determination of gibberellins by high performance liquid chromatography from various gibberellins producing fusarium strains. Environ. Monit. Assess. 167(1–4), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1068-5 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dos Santos, J. A. et al. Morphophysiological changes by mepiquat chloride application in eucalyptus clones. Trees 35(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02021-7 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Arampatzis, D. A., Karkanis, A. C. & Tsiropoulos, N. G. Impact of plant density and mepiquat chloride on growth, yield, and silymarin content of Silybum marianum grown under Mediterranean semi-arid conditions. Agronomy 9(11), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110669 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Anastassiadou, M. et al. Modification of the temporary maximum residue level for mepiquat in oyster mushrooms. EFSA J. 17, 7. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5744 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Dalimunthe, R. H., Setiado, H., Lubis, K. & Damanik, R. I. Effect of paclobutrazol in micro tuberization of potato cultivar Granola Kembang and Repita (IOP Conference Series) (Earth and Environmental Science, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/782/4/042058.

Book Google Scholar

Bao, W. et al. A single gene transfer of gibberellin biosynthesis gene cluster increases gibberellin production in a Fusarium fujikuroi strain with gibberellin low producibility. Plant Pathol. 69(5), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13176 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Le, V. N. et al. The potential health risks and environmental pollution associated with the application of plant growth regulators in vegetable production in several suburban areas of Hanoi, Vietnam. Biol. Futura 71(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-020-00041-5 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ricci, M., Tilbury, L., Daridon, B. & Sukalac, K. General principles to justify plant biostimulant claims. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00494 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Essawy, H. A. et al. Potassium fulvate-functionalized graft copolymer of polyacrylic acid from cellulose as a promising selective chelating sorben. RSC Adv. 7, 20178–20185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA02646C (2017).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Canellas, L. P. et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture—A review. Sci. Hortic. 196, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ghazy, M. et al. Potassium fulvate as co-interpenetrating agent during graft polymerization of acrylic acid from cellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.088 (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Elrys, A. S. et al. Integrative application of licorice root extract or lipoic acid with fulvic acid improves wheat production and defenses under salt stress conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 190, 110144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110144 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Cayón Salinas, D. G. et al. Application of naphthalene acetic acid and gibberellic acid favours fruit induction and development in oil palm hybrid (Elaeis oleifera x Elaeis guineensis). Exp. Agric. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447972200031X (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ahmad, A. S., Abramov, A. G., Shalamova, A. A. & Antar, M. B. Effect of humic acid and naphthalene acetic acid on vegetative growth and fruit quality of tomato plants lycopersicon esculentum. Vestnik Rossijskogo Univ. Družby Narodov 15(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2020-15-1-30-39 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Xing, X. et al. Improved drought tolerance by α-naphthaleneacetic acid-induced ROS accumulation in two soybean cultivars. J. Integr. Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61273-4 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, F. et al. Plant growth regulation enhanced potassium uptake and use efficiency in cotton. Field Crops Res. 163, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.03.016 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, H. J., Zhang, H. Y. & Yu, J. H. Effects of α-naphthalene acetic acid sodium on yield and endogenous hormones of greenhouse grown pepper in desert area. J. Desert Res. 33, 1390–1399 (2013).

Google Scholar

Ali, M., Mujib, A., Zafar, N. & Tonk, D. Somatic embryogenesis, biochemical alterations and synthetic seed development in two varieties of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Adv. Hortic. Sci. 32(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.13128/ahs-22287 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Hesami, M., Daneshvar, M. H. & Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi, M. An efficient in vitro shoot regeneration through direct organogenesis from seedling-derived petiole and leaf segments and acclimatization of Ficus religiosa. J. For. Res. 30(3), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0647-0 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ren, M. et al. Assessing the genetic improvement in inbred late rice against chilling stress: Consequences for spikelet fertility, pollen viability and anther characteristics. Agronomy 12, 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081894 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Rahimi, A., Mohammadi, M. M., Siavash Moghaddam, S., Heydarzadeh, S. & Gitari, H. Effects of stress modifier biostimulants on vegetative growth, nutrients, and antioxidants contents of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under water deficit conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 41(5), 2059–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10604-6 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Noh, E., Fallen, B., Payero, J. & Narayanan, S. Parsimonious root systems and better root distribution can improve biomass production and yield of soybean. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270109 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Halpern, M. et al. Chapter two: The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Adv. Agron. 130, 141–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.001 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, L. et al. Direct evidence of drought stress memory in mulberry from a physiological perspective: Antioxidative, osmotic and phytohormonal regulations. Plant Physiol. Biochem. (PPB) 186, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.07.001 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liang, J. et al. Dualistic effects of bisphenol A on growth, photosynthetic and oxidative stress of duckweed (Lemna minor). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29(58), 87717–87729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21785-8 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lixiao, N. et al. Enhancement in seed priming-induced starch degradation of rice seed under chilling stress via GA-mediated α-amylase expression. Rice https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-022-00567-3 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Gu, K. et al. The physiological response of different tobacco varieties to chilling stress during the vigorous growing period. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 22136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01703-7 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, F. et al. Application of enzymatic hydrolysate of Ulva clathrata as biostimulant improved physiological and metabolic adaptation to salt-alkaline stress in wheat. J. Appl. Phycol. 34(3), 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02684-4 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wang, W. et al. Animal-derived plant biostimulant alleviates drought stress by regulating photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant systems in tomato plants. Sci. Hortic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111365 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Chi, Y. et al. Utilization of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot extract as a biostimulant to enhance the growth of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 41(8), 3208–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10506-z (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Duan, R., Ma, Y., & Yang, L. Effects of shading on photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic parameters of Lespedeza buergeri seedlings. in IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 452(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/452/2/022158 (2018).

Li, J. et al. Seasonal changes of leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy of photosynthetic capacity in winter wheat and paddy rice. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109018 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Mozhgan, A., Kazemeini, S. A., Mozhgan, S. & Ali, D. Simultaneous application of rhizobium strain and melatonin improves the photosynthetic capacity and induces antioxidant defense system in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under salinity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 41(3), 1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10386-3 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sun, M. et al. Effects of mesotrione on the control efficiency and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Chenopodium album under simulated rainfall conditionss. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267649 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Singh, H., Kumar, D. & Soni, V. Performance of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in lemna minor under heavy metal stress induced by various concentration of copper. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 10620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14985-2 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Torres, R., Diz, V. E. & Lagorio, M. G. Improved photosynthetic performance induced by Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Photochem Photobiol. Sci. 21(11), 1931–1946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00269-1 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Tian, J., Wang, Z. & Feng, K. Monitoring the photosynthetic performance of grape leaves using a hyperspectral-based machine learning model. Eur. J. Agron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126589 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Noor, H. et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence and grain filling characteristic of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to nitrogen application level. Mol. Biol. Rep. 49(7), 7157–7172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07612-w (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Correia, C. et al. Red and blue light differently influence Actinidia chinensis performance and its interaction with Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(21), 13145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113145 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, J. et al. Melatonin enhances the low-temperature combined low-light tolerance of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings by regulating photosynthesis, carotenoid, and hormone metabolism. Environ. Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104868 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ni, Y. et al. Exogenous melatonin enhances photosynthetic capacity and related gene expression in a dose-dependent manner in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(12), 6694. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126694 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zheng, J. et al. Growth and energy use efficiency of grafted tomato transplants as affected by LED light quality and photon flux density. Agriculture 11, 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090816 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Weerasekara, I. et al. Priming with humic acid to reverse ageing damage in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Seeds Agricult. 1, 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100966 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liu, Y. & Zhang, J. Lanthanum promotes bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) roots growth by improving root activity, photosynthesis and respiration. Plants 11(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030382 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wintermans, J. & De Mots, A. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their phenophytins in ethanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biophys. Incl. Photosynth. 109, 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6585(65)90170-6 (1965).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Song, Y. et al. Effect on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Anthurium andreanum (‘Pink Champion’, ‘Alabama’) under hydroponic culture by different LED light spectra. Horticulturae 8, 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050389 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Oxborough, K. & Baker, N. R. Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components: Calculation of qP and Fv’/Fm’ without measuring F’0. Photosynth. Res. 54, 135–142 (1997).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Paoletti, F., Aldinucci, D., Mocali, A. & Caparrini, A. A sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of superoxide dismutase activity in tissue extracts. Anal. Biochem. 154, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(86)90026-6 (1986).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jana, S. & Choudhuri, M. A. Glycolate metabolism of three submersed aquatic angiosperms: effect of heavy metals. Aquat. Bot. 11, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(81)90047-4 (1981).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 (1986).

Article Google Scholar

Lin, P.H., & Chao, Y.Y. Different drought-tolerant mechanisms in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) based on physiological analysis. Plants 10, 2279 (2021)

Download references

We are thankful to anonymous reviewers and editors for their helpful comments and suggestions.

This research was funded by the Project for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01-27); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32201897); the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2021JJ40248).

These authors contributed equally: Maofei Ren and Guiling Mao.

College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

Maofei Ren, Huabin Zheng, Weiqin Wang & Qiyuan Tang

College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China

Guiling Mao

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

M.R., G.M., H.Z. have made substantial contributions to the conception, design of the work, drafting the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content. M.R., G.M. contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. W.W.,Q.T. contributed to the agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Weiqin Wang or Qiyuan Tang.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Ren, M., Mao, G., Zheng, H. et al. Growth changes of tomato seedlings responding to sodium salt of α-naphthalene acetic acid and potassium salt of fulvic acid. Sci Rep 13, 4024 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31023-x

Download citation

Received: 06 December 2022

Accepted: 06 March 2023

Published: 10 March 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31023-x

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.